Skip to content
jonathanhodak.com
Return to Mission Control

Selected system / personal and professional work

In progress

Enterprise AI platform consolidation

Helping transform independently developed AI capabilities into a cohesive application and platform architecture for employees across a large organization.

The problem

The engagement began around one product team. As the capabilities became relevant to a broader internal AI initiative, independently developed systems needed to fit into a common platform experience without erasing the boundaries of the teams that built them.

Scope

Architectural scope spans capabilities developed by six or more independent engineering teams: AI applications and experimentation, model lifecycle and MLOps, managed development and execution workspaces, control-plane services, deployment and runtime, and shared AI infrastructure.

My role

My contribution

I contribute cross-team architecture and technical direction, connecting system capabilities and assumptions into a coherent application and platform model. Each participating team retains responsibility for the systems it builds.

Current work

How the architectural scope grew

In my current contractor engagement in a large enterprise retail environment, I contribute architecture to an internal AI platform initiative. I help connect capabilities built by separate teams into a coherent platform and shared employee experience; those teams remain responsible for their systems.

  1. 01

    Initial focus

    One product team

    The engagement began with architecture work focused on one product team.

  2. 02

    Architectural scope

    Capabilities from six or more teams

    As the initiative widened, my architectural scope came to span capabilities developed by six or more independent engineering teams.

  3. 03

    Platform direction

    One enterprise AI control center

    The platform is being consolidated to help employees build, use, manage, and deploy AI capabilities through a more cohesive experience.

Areas of architectural responsibility

Cross-team architecture

Reconcile independent system assumptions into platform boundaries that allow capabilities to work together.

  • Service boundaries
  • Integration patterns
  • Common architecture

Application and workflow architecture

Shape shared navigation, application structure, and workflows around how employees build and operate AI systems.

  • Application architecture
  • Navigation
  • Workflows

Shared AI platform capabilities

Connect experimentation and model lifecycle capabilities with workspaces, control-plane services, runtime, and infrastructure.

  • Platform consolidation
  • Reusable patterns
  • Deployment and runtime

Engineering enablement

Contribute technical direction, engineering standards, developer experience, and AI-assisted engineering practices across team boundaries.

  • Standards
  • Developer enablement
  • AI-assisted practice

System design

Architecture and technical decisions

  1. Treat separately developed systems as capabilities within a shared platform architecture, with clear service and integration boundaries.

  2. Connect the capabilities through common navigation and workflows so employees can build, use, manage, and deploy AI systems in one coherent experience.

  3. Establish reusable platform patterns and engineering standards while preserving team-level domain responsibility.

  4. Bring application architecture, control-plane services, model lifecycle, workspaces, runtime, and infrastructure into a consistent operating model.

System boundaries

Constraints and qualifications

  • Participating teams retain responsibility for the systems and domain capabilities they build.
  • The architecture must reconcile independent system assumptions and integration boundaries.
  • The participating systems depend on additional foundational and platform services beneath the shared experience.

Design approach

Guiding principles

  • Converge capabilities into shared application and platform patterns while keeping domain ownership clear.
  • Make navigation and workflows support how employees build, use, manage, and deploy AI capabilities.
  • Set technical direction across team boundaries without implying formal ownership of those teams.

Conceptual architecture

System views

Consolidating independent capabilities into a shared platform.

I contribute cross-team architecture and technical direction for the shared application and convergence layer connecting AI development, model lifecycle, managed workspaces, control-plane services, runtime, and foundational capabilities.

Enterprise AI — conceptual system topologyAn architectural illustration of in-progress capability convergence, not live telemetry or private production topology. Participating teams retain ownership of their systems. Execution mode: once. Components: AI applications (Build · experiment); Model lifecycle (MLOps capabilities); Managed workspaces (Develop · execute); Control plane (Shared platform services); Runtime and deployment (Release · operate); Shared infrastructure (Foundational services); Convergence architecture (Boundaries · patterns); Unified AI experience (Intended employee workflow). Ordered stages: AI applications and Model lifecycle and Managed workspaces and Control plane and Runtime and deployment and Shared infrastructure; Convergence architecture; Unified AI experience. Connections: AI applications to Convergence architecture; Model lifecycle to Convergence architecture; Managed workspaces to Convergence architecture; Control plane to Convergence architecture; Runtime and deployment to Convergence architecture; Shared infrastructure to Convergence architecture; Convergence architecture to Unified AI experience. Optional conditional paths are shown but do not run in the illustrated sequence.AI applicationsBuild · experimentModel lifecycleMLOps capabilitiesManaged workspacesDevelop · executeControl planeShared platform servicesRuntime anddeploymentRelease · operateShared infrastructureFoundational servicesConvergencearchitectureBoundaries · patternsUnified AI experienceIntended employee workflow
  • idle
  • incoming
  • active
  • outgoing
  • settled

Conceptual sequence · not live telemetry.

Execution sequence

  1. 01
    AI applications + Model lifecycle + Managed workspaces + Control plane + Runtime and deployment + Shared infrastructureAI applications → Convergence architecture · Model lifecycle → Convergence architecture · Managed workspaces → Convergence architecture · Control plane → Convergence architecture · Runtime and deployment → Convergence architecture · Shared infrastructure → Convergence architecture
  2. 02
    Convergence architectureConvergence architecture → Unified AI experience
  3. 03
    Unified AI experience
Conceptual execution · explicit dependencies · not live telemetry

Intended effect

Intended effect

Architectural consolidation is intended to create a unified enterprise AI control center and operating model through which employees can build, use, manage, and deploy AI capabilities.